Profile picture of David Paul McQuiggin
David Paul McQuiggin
[Remote] .NET Lead Engineer | Solution Architect | CTO | Azure | Data | AI
Follow me
Generated by linktime
October 7, 2025
This one is a curious decision... "Role Overview: We are seeking a .NET Developer to contribute to the migration of an existing .NET-based system to Python. The focus of this role is on rebuilding and optimizing Front End & Back End processes and APIs to support a more data-driven, scalable platform." While I can see Python might be suited to say Data Engineering tasks within the system, I'd be surprised if it scaled better than a .NET solution, or provided more functional APIs. Quite the opposite, I would suggest.
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

7 Likes
October 7, 2025
Discussion about this post
Profile picture of Michel P.
Michel P.
Sr. Software Developer,--Software Creator of the hybrid kind-- Discover – Address – Build – Deliver -- Does Development since 1998 as pro and 1985 as amateur
1 month ago
I had a big laugh , about the stupidity of that company as it is like we have an Aircraft carrier but we would like to replace it with a submarine and expect to have a greater strike capability with fighter jets.
Sunday evening take: One thing I dislike about working in software development over all these years, is that so much time is spent arguing over software ideology, as if there is an absolute perfection or one true way. e.g. SOLID is guidance, to be taken under consideration, applicable in some scenarios and not in others, it is not the word of god / the one true way. Developers spend too much time fighting over their interpretation of what is basically other people's opinions, something they have read very recently in a blog or seen in a course, as if it is some sort of divine inspiration. They then point-score as to who has the most perfect understanding of the opinion of someone who wrote a book about their own experience, but has no idea of the realities of the project you are now working on. I have been in so many code reviews, where developers were obsessed with arguing over the minutiae of a particular line of code and how it does not meet framework guidelines / latest C# language syntax / a specific pattern in a book, that they completely missed that it did not actually meet the business requirements. Guidance such as SOLID, Clean Coding, DDD etc. is fine if you treat it in the same way as 'look both ways before crossing the road', but not 'you must spend 10 seconds when looking left, and no more than 1 second later, look right for 13 seconds, or a successful crossing of the road will be deemed inadmissible' Be pragmatic instead of dogmatic, is the best advice I can give, after 32 years of building systems.
21 comments
April 3, 2022