Profile picture of David Paul McQuiggin
David Paul McQuiggin
[Remote] .NET Lead Engineer | Solution Architect | CTO | Azure | Data | AI
Follow me
Generated by linktime
November 5, 2022
Many permanent jobs are not permanent, they are just lower-paid contract assignments, to be terminated by the company when they hit hard times. I prefer some honesty about the relationship between a company and the resource they hire, so I work purely on a contract basis. The example you give is yet another reason for companies to at least consider hiring contractors when predicting future needs, and also why governments such as the UK should stop stigmatising contractors, and enacting poorly thought out legislation such as IR35. There are many occasions where companies need a flexible workforce, from experience working with finance companies in the UK and Netherlands, they will typically face compliance legislation that leads to peaks in software development tasks, as one example. When predicting growth, why not hire contractors to perform initial implementations, and hire permanent when the growth is actually realised, to consolidate?
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

November 5, 2022
Sunday evening take: One thing I dislike about working in software development over all these years, is that so much time is spent arguing over software ideology, as if there is an absolute perfection or one true way. e.g. SOLID is guidance, to be taken under consideration, applicable in some scenarios and not in others, it is not the word of god / the one true way. Developers spend too much time fighting over their interpretation of what is basically other people's opinions, something they have read very recently in a blog or seen in a course, as if it is some sort of divine inspiration. They then point-score as to who has the most perfect understanding of the opinion of someone who wrote a book about their own experience, but has no idea of the realities of the project you are now working on. I have been in so many code reviews, where developers were obsessed with arguing over the minutiae of a particular line of code and how it does not meet framework guidelines / latest C# language syntax / a specific pattern in a book, that they completely missed that it did not actually meet the business requirements. Guidance such as SOLID, Clean Coding, DDD etc. is fine if you treat it in the same way as 'look both ways before crossing the road', but not 'you must spend 10 seconds when looking left, and no more than 1 second later, look right for 13 seconds, or a successful crossing of the road will be deemed inadmissible' Be pragmatic instead of dogmatic, is the best advice I can give, after 32 years of building systems.
21 comments
April 3, 2022