Profile picture of David Paul McQuiggin
David Paul McQuiggin
[Remote] .NET Lead Engineer | Solution Architect | CTO | Azure | Data | AI
Follow me
Generated by linktime
May 9, 2023
I posted several years ago, that monoliths would become fashionable again. I'm waiting for the next step - how to scale your monolith... And then, the same people currently espousing monoliths, will re-enact microservices. In the meantime, sensible people are focusing on obtaining clearly defined business requirements, which is where the majority of software projects actually encounter problems, not in technical implementation. Deployment options should be something that is flexible, and can be changed over the lifetime of a software system, to meet demand. If you construct your code in a modular fashion, you can adopt any number of different architectures; low-latency, high-scalability, redundancy, low-cost - all of these will have a different priority in any meaningful software system, and are not mutually exclusive; the technique adopted for any individual feature is based on specific requirements, that might be very different for related services.
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

May 9, 2023
Sunday evening take: One thing I dislike about working in software development over all these years, is that so much time is spent arguing over software ideology, as if there is an absolute perfection or one true way. e.g. SOLID is guidance, to be taken under consideration, applicable in some scenarios and not in others, it is not the word of god / the one true way. Developers spend too much time fighting over their interpretation of what is basically other people's opinions, something they have read very recently in a blog or seen in a course, as if it is some sort of divine inspiration. They then point-score as to who has the most perfect understanding of the opinion of someone who wrote a book about their own experience, but has no idea of the realities of the project you are now working on. I have been in so many code reviews, where developers were obsessed with arguing over the minutiae of a particular line of code and how it does not meet framework guidelines / latest C# language syntax / a specific pattern in a book, that they completely missed that it did not actually meet the business requirements. Guidance such as SOLID, Clean Coding, DDD etc. is fine if you treat it in the same way as 'look both ways before crossing the road', but not 'you must spend 10 seconds when looking left, and no more than 1 second later, look right for 13 seconds, or a successful crossing of the road will be deemed inadmissible' Be pragmatic instead of dogmatic, is the best advice I can give, after 32 years of building systems.
21 comments
April 3, 2022