Profile picture of David Paul McQuiggin
David Paul McQuiggin
[Remote] .NET Lead Engineer | Solution Architect | CTO | Azure | Data | AI
Follow me
Generated by linktime
September 2, 2024
About 33% of coding is being able to troubleshoot and solve issues where a complex system does not behave as the documentation claims it should. Either a bug, misconfigurations, version conflicts, mistakes buried deep in dependency trees of third-party packages, transient faults... or simply incorrect documentation. Just today, I was building a docker-compose file, and was getting EOF errors when an MSSQL image was being pulled from the Microsoft container registry. On a hunch, I fired up a VPN and changed the region from Europe to US, sure enough, it worked. There seems to be some fault in the container registry that serves my specific region. AI would just keep insisting the docker-compose should work, or just try randomising various versions of the yaml contents. Humans have certain attributes that will never be replicated in AI. AI can be trained to respond like a human, but not think outside the box - injecting randomness is not the same.
Stay updated
Subscribe to receive my future LinkedIn posts in your mailbox.

By clicking "Subscribe", you agree to receive emails from linktime.co.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

September 2, 2024
Sunday evening take: One thing I dislike about working in software development over all these years, is that so much time is spent arguing over software ideology, as if there is an absolute perfection or one true way. e.g. SOLID is guidance, to be taken under consideration, applicable in some scenarios and not in others, it is not the word of god / the one true way. Developers spend too much time fighting over their interpretation of what is basically other people's opinions, something they have read very recently in a blog or seen in a course, as if it is some sort of divine inspiration. They then point-score as to who has the most perfect understanding of the opinion of someone who wrote a book about their own experience, but has no idea of the realities of the project you are now working on. I have been in so many code reviews, where developers were obsessed with arguing over the minutiae of a particular line of code and how it does not meet framework guidelines / latest C# language syntax / a specific pattern in a book, that they completely missed that it did not actually meet the business requirements. Guidance such as SOLID, Clean Coding, DDD etc. is fine if you treat it in the same way as 'look both ways before crossing the road', but not 'you must spend 10 seconds when looking left, and no more than 1 second later, look right for 13 seconds, or a successful crossing of the road will be deemed inadmissible' Be pragmatic instead of dogmatic, is the best advice I can give, after 32 years of building systems.
21 comments
April 3, 2022